OCZ Vector 150 (120GB & 240GB) Review | Techkeyfactor

OCZ Vector 150 (120GB & 240GB) Review

by Kristian Vättö on November 7, 2013 9:00 AM EST


Random Read/Write Speed

The four corners of SSD performance are as follows: random read, random write, sequential read and sequential write speed. Random accesses are generally small in size, while sequential accesses tend to be larger and thus we have the four Iometer tests we use in all of our reviews.
Our first test writes 4KB in a completely random pattern over an 8GB space of the drive to simulate the sort of random access that you'd see on an OS drive (even this is more stressful than a normal desktop user would see). I perform three concurrent IOs and run the test for 3 minutes. The results reported are in average MB/s over the entire time. We use both standard pseudo randomly generated data for each write as well as fully random data to show you both the maximum and minimum performance offered by SandForce based drives in these tests. The average performance of SF drives will likely be somewhere in between the two values for each drive you see in the graphs. For an understanding of why this matters, read our original SandForce article.
Desktop Iometer - 4KB Random Read
Random read performance remains unchanged but the Vector 150 wasn't supposed to bring any improvements to that anyway.
Desktop Iometer - 4KB Random Write
Random write speeds at queue depth of 3 take a hit, though I'm thinking this might be due to the new smaller process node NAND. When the queue depth is increased to 32, the performance is on-par with the original Vector thanks to parallelism.
Desktop Iometer - 4KB Random Write (QD=32)

Sequential Read/Write Speed

To measure sequential performance I ran a 1 minute long 128KB sequential test over the entire span of the drive at a queue depth of 1. The results reported are in average MB/s over the entire test length.
Desktop Iometer - 128KB Sequential Read
No surprises here either. Sequential performance has remained mostly the same for the last year or so and we won't see another bump until M.2 and other PCIe-based designs get more popular.
Desktop Iometer - 128KB Sequential Write

AS-SSD Incompressible Sequential Read/Write Performance

The AS-SSD sequential benchmark uses incompressible data for all of its transfers. The result is a pretty big reduction in sequential write speed on SandForce based controllers.
Incompressible Sequential Read Performance
Incompressible Sequential Write Performance

Source:AnandTech.

0 comments:

Techkeyfactor copyright © 2015 allright are reserved. Powered by Blogger.

Top5 Events